End-to-end Exposure Management Across the Hybrid Enterprise

Gain a holistic visibility and analysis of attack paths that span across on-prem and multi-cloud environments to fix the most critical exposures and stop attacks before they happen.

Key Product Features

Supply Chain and Third Party Risk Management

Move beyond compliance and ad-hoc penetration testing to a continuous view of risk when a connected third party you use is compromised, and reduce your attack surface.

Check Out More Resources

View More
Attack Path Management

Description for Attack Path Management

11 Top Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Vendors

A look at the top vendors in the breach and attack simulation (BAS) market, a new IT security technology that promises continuous vulnerability assessment.

2022 Attack Path Management Impact Report

The XM Cyber 2022 Attack Path Management Impact Report is the industry’s first annual report that reveals the likelihood and impact of a breach,…

2022’s Most Potent Attack Paths

Attackers don’t think like you do. They’re looking for ways to bypass your security controls and take advantage of various exposures that exist in…

4 Top Methods Attackers Use to Move Across Your Hybrid Networks and Compromise Business-critical Assets
Michael Greenberg | July 13, 2022

Cybersecurity is a cat-and-mouse game, and it’s important for defenders to be able to anticipate the likely methods attackers will use to compromise their…

Key Product Features

Supply Chain and Third Party Risk Management

Move beyond compliance and ad-hoc penetration testing to a continuous view of risk when a connected third party you use is compromised, and reduce your attack surface.

The Widening Remediation Deficit of Vulnerability Management

Fixing every known vulnerability has always been operationally infeasible.
With over 29,000 new CVEs reported in 2023, and an estimated YoY growth of 25% for the year ahead, this emediation deficit is only set to grow.
The sheer number of vulnerabilities is only the tip of the iceberg, with the growing diversity and distribution of assets, combined with outdated prioritization logic. So even teams with ample resources patching and testing can take an extended period of time, due to complex approval processes, and limited context as to which systems to patch first, and why.

Limited
rioritization

Singular viewpoint of asset risk, distracts from the big picture problem

One by One is Never Done

Focusing on individual CVEs, limits the effectiveness of patching

Lack of
Context

for business impact risk that warrants the justification to act